<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Internet Law &#38; Business Law Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kellylawblog.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kellylawblog.com</link>
	<description>Internet Lawyer Arizona</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Apr 2013 03:09:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Tesla Motor&#8217;s Defamation Saga</title>
		<link>http://www.kellylawblog.com/tesla-motors-defamation-saga/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=tesla-motors-defamation-saga</link>
		<comments>http://www.kellylawblog.com/tesla-motors-defamation-saga/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2013 21:50:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Defamation]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kellylawblog.com/?p=626</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
In certain circles, Tesla Motors is the new darling of the automotive industry – and those circles don’t take kindly when detractors trash their “Great Battery Hope.” So when New York Times reporter, John Broder, penned and published a less than flattering column about a Tesla Model S test drive, the blogosphere perked up and chimed in. Who was right? Would Tesla sue the NTY for defamation even though a UK court recently ruled against them? Below is the whole story.
Elon Musk is part Steve Jobs, part Sir Richard Branson and part Henry Ford. Evidence: back in the day, the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kellylawblog.com/tesla-motors-defamation-saga/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Aaron&#8217;s Law: A Necessary Change to the CFAA</title>
		<link>http://www.kellylawblog.com/aarons-law-a-necessary-change-to-the-cfaa/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=aarons-law-a-necessary-change-to-the-cfaa</link>
		<comments>http://www.kellylawblog.com/aarons-law-a-necessary-change-to-the-cfaa/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2013 04:36:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Law and Intellectual Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet law]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kellylawblog.com/?p=604</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sadly, Aaron Swartz recently took his own life. An oppressive federal lawsuit, over a victim-less crime, is thought to be the true impetus for his death. If Swartz had lost the suit, it would&#8217;ve meant a multi-decade prison sentence for the computer genius.
To ensure nobody else in Aaron’s position feels forced to make the same ultimate sacrifice, Rep. Zoe Lofgren wants to change the law. The congresswoman from California introduced Aaron’s Law, an amendment to the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act.
Aaron’s Story: Genius with a Yen for Information
Ever used an RSS feed? You can thank Aaron Swartz for that. As [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kellylawblog.com/aarons-law-a-necessary-change-to-the-cfaa/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>An Illegal Downloading Lawsuit May Be Headed To 1 First Street</title>
		<link>http://www.kellylawblog.com/an-illegal-downloading-lawsuit-may-be-headed-to-1-first-street/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=an-illegal-downloading-lawsuit-may-be-headed-to-1-first-street</link>
		<comments>http://www.kellylawblog.com/an-illegal-downloading-lawsuit-may-be-headed-to-1-first-street/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2012 20:42:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[illegal downloading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intellectual property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet lawyer]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kellylawblog.com/?p=595</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Will 2013 be the year that the Supreme Court of the United States accepts an illegal music downloading case? If K.A.D. Camara has anything to say about it, then “yes,” it will be. For about five years, K.A.D. Camara has represented Jammie Thomas-Rasset, a music “pirate” sued by the Recording Industry Association of America for illegally obtaining – via the Internet – 24 songs. After years of litigation, Camara filed a writ of certiorari, with hopes that the highest court in the land will debate and decide on whether or not the financial awards handed down in illegal downloading lawsuits are [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kellylawblog.com/an-illegal-downloading-lawsuit-may-be-headed-to-1-first-street/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The iPad Data Security Lawsuit &#8212; What&#8217;s Next?</title>
		<link>http://www.kellylawblog.com/the-ipad-data-security-lawsuit-whats-next/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=the-ipad-data-security-lawsuit-whats-next</link>
		<comments>http://www.kellylawblog.com/the-ipad-data-security-lawsuit-whats-next/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Nov 2012 08:39:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>aaronklaw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Law and Intellectual Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology Law]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kellylawblog.com/?p=586</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On June 9th, 2010, Gawker.com ran a story about Andrew Auernheimer (a.k.a., weev) and Daniel Spitler (a.k.a., JacksonBrown), two hackers from the Goatse Security team (GoatSec). Five weeks after Apple’s 3G-enabled iPad was released, Auernheimer and Spitler uncovered a gaping security hole, singular to the 3-G hardware, which exposed personally identifiable information of AT&#38;T customers.
Last week, one of the bug hunters was convicted on one count of conspiring to access a computer without authorization – a violation of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA) &#8212; and one count of fraud. To add insult to injury, his former hacking partner [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kellylawblog.com/the-ipad-data-security-lawsuit-whats-next/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Extend Certain Legal Rights To Social Robots? What’s Up With That?</title>
		<link>http://www.kellylawblog.com/extend-certain-legal-rights-to-social-robots-what%e2%80%99s-up-with-that/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=extend-certain-legal-rights-to-social-robots-what%25e2%2580%2599s-up-with-that</link>
		<comments>http://www.kellylawblog.com/extend-certain-legal-rights-to-social-robots-what%e2%80%99s-up-with-that/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2012 21:14:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>aaronklaw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[robots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology opinions]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kellylawblog.com/?p=583</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Do you think IBM’s WATSON, the super-genius computer who kicked Ken Jennings’ butt on Jeopardy, should be allowed to sue if someone tries to copy the code that informs its artificial intelligence? What about your family roomba, should it be illegal to kick it around? How about DATA from Star Trek TNG, do you think that he, though technically an android, should have the right to file legal claims?
MIT researcher, Kate Darling, recently presented a study on this very subject. She explored whether or social robots should be granted the same legal protections as humans. Now, you may be thinking, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kellylawblog.com/extend-certain-legal-rights-to-social-robots-what%e2%80%99s-up-with-that/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Wikitravel.com v. Wikimedia Foundation Lawsuit: Forking &amp; Other Things</title>
		<link>http://www.kellylawblog.com/the-wikitravel-com-v-wikimedia-foundation-lawsuit-forking-other-things/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=the-wikitravel-com-v-wikimedia-foundation-lawsuit-forking-other-things</link>
		<comments>http://www.kellylawblog.com/the-wikitravel-com-v-wikimedia-foundation-lawsuit-forking-other-things/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2012 04:13:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>aaronklaw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet Law and Intellectual Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intellectual property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open Source Legal Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[website legal compliance]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kellylawblog.com/?p=576</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was reading the other day on Techdirt, about a war that&#8217;s a-brewing in the open source community. In one corner we have the Wikimedia Foundation; in the other, Internet Brands – the company that owns and operates Wikitravel.com. A saga involving volunteer editors, a for-profit wiki site and bombastic court filings, the Wikitravel v. Wikimedia Foundation lawsuit, believe it or not, is so intriguing it could serve as the topic for a made for TV movie.
The Wikitravel.com Tale
Back in 2003, two developers started wikitravel.com using the open-source wiki code. In 2005, Internet Brands – an umbrella company with a [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kellylawblog.com/the-wikitravel-com-v-wikimedia-foundation-lawsuit-forking-other-things/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bland v. Roberts: Free Speech And Facebook &#8220;Liking&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.kellylawblog.com/bland-v-roberts-free-speech-and-facebook-liking/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=bland-v-roberts-free-speech-and-facebook-liking</link>
		<comments>http://www.kellylawblog.com/bland-v-roberts-free-speech-and-facebook-liking/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2012 04:02:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>aaronklaw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet Law and Intellectual Property]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kellylawblog.com/?p=573</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Below the good ole’ Mason Dixon, at the U.S. District Court, in the Old Dominion state of Virginia, an employment lawsuit ostensibly fit for a modern-day Atticus Finch was recently heard – Bland v. Roberts. The drama involves the Hampton Virginia’s Sheriff’s Department, an election, an incumbent and the firing of several employees.
While the details of the actual staffing issue are better left for a human resources attorney, the case does have Internet law implications. Specifically it addresses the question of whether or not “liking” something on Facebook qualifies as “speech” protected by the First Amendment.
Internet Law Aspects of Bland [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kellylawblog.com/bland-v-roberts-free-speech-and-facebook-liking/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>It&#8217;s All About Defame and Fortune</title>
		<link>http://www.kellylawblog.com/its-all-about-defame-and-fortune/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=its-all-about-defame-and-fortune</link>
		<comments>http://www.kellylawblog.com/its-all-about-defame-and-fortune/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 19:28:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>aaronklaw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Online Defamation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defame]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[expense paid trip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[face reality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new york city]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online defamation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reality show]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reality television]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kellylawblog.com/?p=567</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[People are people, and boy oh boy what a mélange of misfits and mudslingers we are! Now, I thought I’ve seen it all when it comes to reality television, but never in a million years did I think I’d see the day where we could tune into a half-hour program about Internet defamation.
Many have been fell victim to online defamation. Raise your hand if that&#8217;s you. If your hand is in the air, you may be in reality-show luck, because somebody has come up with a way to capitalize on all that online defamation that’s happening.
That’s right, RealityWanted.com has reached [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kellylawblog.com/its-all-about-defame-and-fortune/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FTC Targets Acne App Marketers; First Mobile Medical Case For Commission</title>
		<link>http://www.kellylawblog.com/ftc-targets-acne-app-marketers-first-mobile-medical-case/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=ftc-targets-acne-app-marketers-first-mobile-medical-case</link>
		<comments>http://www.kellylawblog.com/ftc-targets-acne-app-marketers-first-mobile-medical-case/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 22:25:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>aaronklaw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Affiliate Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government Regulations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Acne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AcneApp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AcnePwer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ftc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medical claims]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kellylawblog.com/?p=562</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hear that? It’s the sound of thousands of teenagers sighing because the FTC crushed their faith in a popular acne-fighting smartphone app. Last week, much to the dismay of 14,900 pimple-plagued people, Jon Lebowitz and his merry band of trade commissioners announced a consent agreement reached with the operators of “Acne Pwner” and “Acne App.”
Sheesh, first it was Justin Beiber’s Free-Scooter battle and now this!
All jokes aside, dealing with acne is emotional. Sufferers should be safeguarded against marketers pushing scientifically unsubstantiated blemish-busting products. So the FTC hopped on the case.
The Great Red-Blue Hope
We live in a world where Marty [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kellylawblog.com/ftc-targets-acne-app-marketers-first-mobile-medical-case/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mobile and Online Payment Fraud Is The New Black. What Are You Going To Do About It?</title>
		<link>http://www.kellylawblog.com/mobile-and-online-payment-fraud-is-the-new-black-what-are-you-going-to-do-about-it/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=mobile-and-online-payment-fraud-is-the-new-black-what-are-you-going-to-do-about-it</link>
		<comments>http://www.kellylawblog.com/mobile-and-online-payment-fraud-is-the-new-black-what-are-you-going-to-do-about-it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2011 06:45:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>aaronklaw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Affiliate Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawyer's advice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal assistance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile payments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[payment fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vesta corporation]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kellylawblog.com/?p=557</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A primer for online and mobile business owners on the current state of payment fraud
It’s time to get serious about payment fraud and data protection. 007 serious.
Look, digital advancements have changed our world for the better, but they’ve also created more problems – like cyber-crime. Hacking and electronic fraud are now so widespread that large corporations are staffing multi-member electronic-security departments, whose sole job it is to secure and monitor digital data – especially payment details; governments and multinational corporations are actively recruiting hackers to tackle the problem.
So the question becomes: what can you, as a small to medium-sized business [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kellylawblog.com/mobile-and-online-payment-fraud-is-the-new-black-what-are-you-going-to-do-about-it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.889 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2013-05-20 12:09:15 -->
