<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Internet Law &#38; Business Law Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kellylawblog.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kellylawblog.com</link>
	<description>Internet Lawyer Arizona</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 22:33:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>FTC Targets Acne App Marketers; First Mobile Medical Case For Commission</title>
		<link>http://www.kellylawblog.com/2011/09/ftc-targets-acne-app-marketers-first-mobile-medical-case/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=ftc-targets-acne-app-marketers-first-mobile-medical-case</link>
		<comments>http://www.kellylawblog.com/2011/09/ftc-targets-acne-app-marketers-first-mobile-medical-case/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 22:25:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>aaronklaw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Affiliate Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government Regulations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Acne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AcneApp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AcnePwer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ftc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medical claims]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kellylawblog.com/?p=562</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hear that? It’s the sound of thousands of teenagers sighing because the FTC crushed their faith in a popular acne-fighting smartphone app. Last week, much to the dismay of 14,900 pimple-plagued people, Jon Lebowitz and his merry band of trade commissioners announced a consent agreement reached with the operators of “Acne Pwner” and “Acne App.”
Sheesh, first it was Justin Beiber’s Free-Scooter battle and now this!
All jokes aside, dealing with acne is emotional. Sufferers should be safeguarded against marketers pushing scientifically unsubstantiated blemish-busting products. So the FTC hopped on the case.
The Great Red-Blue Hope
We live in a world where Marty [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kellylawblog.com/2011/09/ftc-targets-acne-app-marketers-first-mobile-medical-case/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mobile and Online Payment Fraud Is The New Black. What Are You Going To Do About It?</title>
		<link>http://www.kellylawblog.com/2011/09/mobile-and-online-payment-fraud-is-the-new-black-what-are-you-going-to-do-about-it/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=mobile-and-online-payment-fraud-is-the-new-black-what-are-you-going-to-do-about-it</link>
		<comments>http://www.kellylawblog.com/2011/09/mobile-and-online-payment-fraud-is-the-new-black-what-are-you-going-to-do-about-it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2011 06:45:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>aaronklaw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Affiliate Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawyer's advice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal assistance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile payments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[payment fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vesta corporation]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kellylawblog.com/?p=557</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A primer for online and mobile business owners on the current state of payment fraud
It’s time to get serious about payment fraud and data protection. 007 serious.
Look, digital advancements have changed our world for the better, but they’ve also created more problems – like cyber-crime. Hacking and electronic fraud are now so widespread that large corporations are staffing multi-member electronic-security departments, whose sole job it is to secure and monitor digital data – especially payment details; governments and multinational corporations are actively recruiting hackers to tackle the problem.
So the question becomes: what can you, as a small to medium-sized business [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kellylawblog.com/2011/09/mobile-and-online-payment-fraud-is-the-new-black-what-are-you-going-to-do-about-it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Father In Northern Ireland Moves To Sue Facebook Over Twelve-Year-Old Daughter’s Provocative Profile</title>
		<link>http://www.kellylawblog.com/2011/09/father-in-northern-ireland-moves-to-sue-facebook-over-twelve-year-old-daughter%e2%80%99s-provocative-profile/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=father-in-northern-ireland-moves-to-sue-facebook-over-twelve-year-old-daughter%25e2%2580%2599s-provocative-profile</link>
		<comments>http://www.kellylawblog.com/2011/09/father-in-northern-ireland-moves-to-sue-facebook-over-twelve-year-old-daughter%e2%80%99s-provocative-profile/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2011 00:22:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>aaronklaw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Government Regulations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[COPPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ireland]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kellylawblog.com/?p=554</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What would you do if you came across pornographic pictures of your 12-year-old child on Facebook? A father in Northern Ireland faced said trouble recently – and he’s chosen to go after the social media giant in court. To protect the identity of the naughty daughter, the father’s name was not released.
The plaintiff’s counsel, Hilary Carmichael, explained that her client felt that the pictures his daughter posted on Facebook attracted pedophiles; he blames Facebook for “negligence” since the company does not have stringent enough procedures in place to protect against underage children creating accounts.
In an interview with the BBC, Carmichael [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kellylawblog.com/2011/09/father-in-northern-ireland-moves-to-sue-facebook-over-twelve-year-old-daughter%e2%80%99s-provocative-profile/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Online Defamation On The Rise…Everywhere!</title>
		<link>http://www.kellylawblog.com/2011/08/online-defamation-on-the-rise%e2%80%a6everywhere/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=online-defamation-on-the-rise%25e2%2580%25a6everywhere</link>
		<comments>http://www.kellylawblog.com/2011/08/online-defamation-on-the-rise%e2%80%a6everywhere/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2011 21:53:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>aaronklaw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Online Defamation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cyberlibel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defamation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[England]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online defamation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wales]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kellylawblog.com/?p=549</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Online defamation is becoming an international epidemic!
Politicians over in England and Wales are now looking to inject safeguards into their countries’ defamation legislation, as a means to protect website operators from being intimidation-sued by large corporations with deep pockets. Moreover, parliamentarians hope to provide a more structured way for citizens to get defamatory content removed from the Internet.
Recent statistics made public by Sweet and Maxwell reveal that the number of online defamation lawsuits doubled between 2010 and 2011. Analysts surmise the rise in cyberlibel is directly correlated to the rise in online social networking sites, like Facebook and Google+.
Barrister Karieh [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kellylawblog.com/2011/08/online-defamation-on-the-rise%e2%80%a6everywhere/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>California’s Attorney-General Isn’t Happy; Harris Announces Huge Lawsuit</title>
		<link>http://www.kellylawblog.com/2011/08/california%e2%80%99s-attorney-general-isn%e2%80%99t-happy-harris-announces-huge-lawsuit/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=california%25e2%2580%2599s-attorney-general-isn%25e2%2580%2599t-happy-harris-announces-huge-lawsuit</link>
		<comments>http://www.kellylawblog.com/2011/08/california%e2%80%99s-attorney-general-isn%e2%80%99t-happy-harris-announces-huge-lawsuit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2011 23:51:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>aaronklaw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Misc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homeowner debt scams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kamala Harris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kramer & Kuslow]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kellylawblog.com/?p=545</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Eighteen people in California started this week with a new set of problems. Late last week, on Thursday, August 18, the State’s Attorney General, Kamala Harris, held a press conference and announced plans to move forward with a civil litigation against several law firms, call centers and individuals in the state suspected of allegedly bilking thousands of dollars out of financially strapped homeowners.
According to documents and Harris’ announcement, all of the named defendants allegedly worked together in developing a system where call center employees (and various individuals) cold-called homeowners on the verge of foreclosure, in an attempt to get them [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kellylawblog.com/2011/08/california%e2%80%99s-attorney-general-isn%e2%80%99t-happy-harris-announces-huge-lawsuit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Blind Man Sued For Allegedly Downloading Porn</title>
		<link>http://www.kellylawblog.com/2011/08/blind-man-sued-for-allegedly-downloading-porn/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=blind-man-sued-for-allegedly-downloading-porn</link>
		<comments>http://www.kellylawblog.com/2011/08/blind-man-sued-for-allegedly-downloading-porn/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2011 05:44:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>aaronklaw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Law and Intellectual Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bittorr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[illegal downloading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pay up or else]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kellylawblog.com/?p=542</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[“Tokyo Cougar Creampies” is the adult film that Doe 2,057 was allegedly accused of downloading illegally; the rub is that Doe 2,057 is blind and doesn’t make a point of downloading pornos. “To be honest, it’s a little ridiculous. My movie-watching ability is nonexistent. My kids watch movies, but they are 4 and 6, so they don’t watch porn either. Well, hopefully they don’t,” he explained.
Sigh.  Yet another example of why the on-going witch-hunt for online copyright infringers is ill-conceived.
On The War Path For BitTorrent Abusers
In March 2010, the lawfirm of Dunlop, Grubb and Weaver unleashed their [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kellylawblog.com/2011/08/blind-man-sued-for-allegedly-downloading-porn/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Authorities Continue To Go After Bittorrent &#8220;Burglars&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.kellylawblog.com/2011/08/authorities-continue-to-go-after-bittorrent-burglars/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=authorities-continue-to-go-after-bittorrent-burglars</link>
		<comments>http://www.kellylawblog.com/2011/08/authorities-continue-to-go-after-bittorrent-burglars/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2011 20:24:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>aaronklaw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Law and Intellectual Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bittorrent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cease and desist downloading letters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[torrent lawsuits]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kellylawblog.com/?p=539</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Head’s up, movie downloaders! Authorities are on another copyright infringement war path, and they’re in search of bittorrent abusers. According to a report by TorrentFreak.com, so far in 2011, over 200,000 people in the United States have been sued for sharing protected materials online.
ED2 network users were hit particularly hard &#8212; over 1,200 of them got caught downloading The Hurt Locker. Violators received a letter in the mail; the violation notification presented two options: 1) pay a $2,500 dollar fine now and all is forgiven, or 2) go to court and prove you did not violate copyright laws. The letter [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kellylawblog.com/2011/08/authorities-continue-to-go-after-bittorrent-burglars/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Attention Affiliate Marketers: ClickBank Changed Their Guidelines</title>
		<link>http://www.kellylawblog.com/2011/08/attention-affiliate-marketers-clickbank-changed-their-guidelines/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=attention-affiliate-marketers-clickbank-changed-their-guidelines</link>
		<comments>http://www.kellylawblog.com/2011/08/attention-affiliate-marketers-clickbank-changed-their-guidelines/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2011 19:30:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>aaronklaw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Affiliate Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[affiliate marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ClickBank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guidelines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet marketing]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kellylawblog.com/?p=536</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At the beginning of the month, online affiliate marketplace, Clickbank, changed its promotional guidelines. Over the past several months, the FTC has aggressively pursued online companies suspected of violating various Internet standards established by the commission. Acai berry weight loss and PayDay loan websites were the hardest hit and several online operators were court ordered to pay out millions of dollars in fines.
So, to avoid any legal battle with the FTC and other regulatory agencies, ClickBank executives decided to make affiliate marketing guidelines a bit more FTC-friendly.
Deceptive Marketing And The Internet
While deceptive marketing has long been a civil crime in [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kellylawblog.com/2011/08/attention-affiliate-marketers-clickbank-changed-their-guidelines/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Holy Defamation, Batman! RipOff Report Is Gone!</title>
		<link>http://www.kellylawblog.com/2011/08/holy-defamation-batman-ripoff-report-is-gone/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=holy-defamation-batman-ripoff-report-is-gone</link>
		<comments>http://www.kellylawblog.com/2011/08/holy-defamation-batman-ripoff-report-is-gone/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2011 00:22:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>aaronklaw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Online Defamation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[de-indexing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online defamation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RipOffReport]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kellylawblog.com/?p=532</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I first noticed it around 7:30 am aftering checking a site I&#8217;ve been pushing up in the rankings for a client.  I realized that the familiar tagline of RipOffReport wasn&#8217;t there at #6; I searched the second page and there it was.
So I left it alone.
Curious, I came back a few minutes later and checked again; did a double-take;the RipOffReport link was gone.  Completely. I just figured, &#8220;hey, that&#8217;s cool, it&#8217;s getting pushed down.&#8221;  By 3:00pm I noticed that none of the links for any of the defamation cases I&#8217;m working on were [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kellylawblog.com/2011/08/holy-defamation-batman-ripoff-report-is-gone/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mid-Year Internet Defamation Roundup</title>
		<link>http://www.kellylawblog.com/2011/08/mid-year-internet-defamation-roundup/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=mid-year-internet-defamation-roundup</link>
		<comments>http://www.kellylawblog.com/2011/08/mid-year-internet-defamation-roundup/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2011 05:03:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>aaronklaw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet Law and Intellectual Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Misc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Courtney Love]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Florida defamation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online defamation]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kellylawblog.com/?p=523</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It’s been quite a year for online defamation. The average amount of time spent online seems to be directly proportional to the amount of Internet libel claims. Thanks to the smartphone craze, we’re now plugged-in 24/7, and in the first half of 2011, defamation lawsuits took center stage in court rooms around the world.
Let’s take a look back at three interesting cases.
Dawn Simorangkir  v. Courtney Love: The Drunken Tweets Worth Nearly Half A Million
In 2009, Dawn Simorangkir (a.k.a. “the Boudoir Queen”) had an up-and-coming fashion business – her online sales were doing well and members of the glitterati showed [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kellylawblog.com/2011/08/mid-year-internet-defamation-roundup/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

